Robert Walter Woltz v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

74 F.3d 1235, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38798, 1996 WL 23314
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1996
Docket95-2539
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 F.3d 1235 (Robert Walter Woltz v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Walter Woltz v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, 74 F.3d 1235, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38798, 1996 WL 23314 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1235
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Walter WOLTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-2539.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Robert Walter Woltz, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD; Claire S. Hoffman, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his case for want of prosecution and for failing to keep the court informed of his change in address. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woltz v. Chater, No. CA-95-3599-B (D.Md. May 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SISK v. LASSITER
M.D. North Carolina, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1235, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38798, 1996 WL 23314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-walter-woltz-v-shirley-s-chater-commissione-ca4-1996.