ROBERT WALKER and TAMIKO WALKER v. U.S. BANK, N.A.
This text of ROBERT WALKER and TAMIKO WALKER v. U.S. BANK, N.A. (ROBERT WALKER and TAMIKO WALKER v. U.S. BANK, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ROBERT WALKER and TAMIKO WALKER, Appellants,
v.
U.S. BANK, N.A., ET AL., Appellees.
No. 4D19-1349
[December 12, 2019]
Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Barbara W. Bronis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2014CA000281 (BC).
Robert Walker and Tamiko Walker, Port Saint Lucie, pro se.
Zachary S. Foster of Quarles & Brady LLP, Tampa, Suzanne M. McLean of Hinden, McLean & Arbeiter, P.A., Davie, and William P. Convey of Shendell & Pollock, P.L., Boca Raton, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
MAY, FORST, and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ROBERT WALKER and TAMIKO WALKER v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-walker-and-tamiko-walker-v-us-bank-na-fladistctapp-2019.