Robert W. Sjosten, and v. Merle Scheckloth, Etc.
443 F.2d 1181, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9114
This text of 443 F.2d 1181 (Robert W. Sjosten, and v. Merle Scheckloth, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Robert W. Sjosten, and v. Merle Scheckloth, Etc., 443 F.2d 1181, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9114 (9th Cir. 1971).
Opinion
The order denying habeas corpus relief is affirmed.
First, we find that Sjosten has never presented or attempted to present the point to a California state court which he makes in federal court.
Further, on the facts here, the error does not rise to constitutional dimensions. The evidence of guilt was overwhelming.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
443 F.2d 1181, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-w-sjosten-and-v-merle-scheckloth-etc-ca9-1971.