Robert W. Sjosten, and v. Merle Scheckloth, Etc.
443 F.2d 1181, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9114
Opinion
The order denying habeas corpus relief is affirmed.
First, we find that Sjosten has never presented or attempted to present the point to a California state court which he makes in federal court.
Further, on the facts here, the error does not rise to constitutional dimensions. The evidence of guilt was overwhelming.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert W. Sjosten, and v. Merle Scheckloth, Etc., 443 F.2d 1181, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9114 (9th Cir. 1971).
443 F.2d 1181 (Robert W. Sjosten, and v. Merle Scheckloth, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.