Robert W. O'COnnell v. United States

455 F.2d 521, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10762
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 14, 1972·No. 29984·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

The judgment below is affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. In his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, appellant has alleged that his guilty plea was coerced by the eleven-month delay between his indictment and his arraignment, and consequently was denied the opportunity of having his federal sen-fence run concurrently with a state sentence imposed prior to his indictment.

2

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing-Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert W. O'COnnell v. United States, 455 F.2d 521, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10762 (5th Cir. 1972).

455 F.2d 521 (Robert W. O'COnnell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related