Robert W. Kearns v. United Technologies Corp., and United Technologies Automotive, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Robert W. Kearns v. United Technologies Corp., and United Technologies Automotive, Inc.

53 F.3d 345, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18637, 1995 WL 216870

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 31, 1995·No. 94-1310·Published

Opinion

53 F.3d 345
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Robert W. KEARNS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., and United Technologies
Automotive, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-1310.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 31, 1995.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31. (a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

53 F.3d 345
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Robert W. KEARNS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., and United Technologies
Automotive, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-1310.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 31, 1995.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31. (a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

Robert W. Kearns v. United Technologies Corp., and United Technologies Automotive, Inc., 53 F.3d 345, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18637, 1995 WL 216870 (Fed. Cir. 1995).

Pincite

53 F.3d 345 (Robert W. Kearns v. United Technologies Corp., and United Technologies Automotive, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.