Robert W. Kearns v. United Technologies Corp., and United Technologies Automotive, Inc.
This text of 53 F.3d 345 (Robert W. Kearns v. United Technologies Corp., and United Technologies Automotive, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
53 F.3d 345
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Robert W. KEARNS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., and United Technologies
Automotive, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-1310.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 31, 1995.
ORDER
The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31. (a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is
ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F.3d 345, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18637, 1995 WL 216870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-w-kearns-v-united-technologies-corp-and-uni-cafc-1995.