Robert v. Deery & Harris Investments, Inc.

837 So. 2d 1180, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2152, 2003 WL 465565
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 26, 2003
DocketNo. 2D02-2700
StatusPublished

This text of 837 So. 2d 1180 (Robert v. Deery & Harris Investments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert v. Deery & Harris Investments, Inc., 837 So. 2d 1180, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2152, 2003 WL 465565 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Gloria Robert appeals from a temporary injunction enjoining her from constructing a driveway onto an easement held by Deery & Harris Investments, Inc. We find no merit in Robert’s arguments and affirm. With regard to Robert’s contention that the trial court erred in establishing a $2000 bond without sufficient evidence, we note that Robert may seek an increase of the bond in the trial court if proven to be necessary.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 So. 2d 1180, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2152, 2003 WL 465565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-v-deery-harris-investments-inc-fladistctapp-2003.