Robert v. Boynton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Robert v. Boynton

30 Ga. 939

DecidedJune 15, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Ga. 939 (Robert v. Boynton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert v. Boynton, 30 Ga. 939 (Ga. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

The only question in this case is, whether a party to the record, who has no interest at the trial, in the event of the [940]*940suit, can be examined ? It was solemnly decided that he could be in the case of the Central Railroad and Banking Company against Hines, Perkins & Co. 19 Ga. Rep., 203. And the same point has since been reaffirmed after the most thorough examination. The point, therefore, is no longer an open question in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

The only question in this case is, whether a party to the record, who has no interest at the trial, in the event of the [940]*940suit, can be examined ? It was solemnly decided that he could be in the case of the Central Railroad and Banking Company against Hines, Perkins & Co. 19 Ga. Rep., 203. And the same point has since been reaffirmed after the most thorough examination. The point, therefore, is no longer an open question in this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Ga. 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-v-boynton-ga-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack