Robert Trobich, William Behrens, and Michael Porter v. R. Bruce Tharpe and Christopher James Ronquillo
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00209-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
ROBERT TROBICH, WILLIAM BEHRENS, AND MICHAEL PORTER, Appellants,
v.
R. BRUCE THARPE AND CHRISTOPHER JAMES RONQUILLO, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellants’ brief in the above cause was due on September 25, 2012. On
October 17, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been
timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellees
were not significantly injured by the appellants’ failure to timely file a brief. To date, no
response has been received from appellants.
Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file the brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 29th day of November, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert Trobich, William Behrens, and Michael Porter v. R. Bruce Tharpe and Christopher James Ronquillo (Robert Trobich, William Behrens, and Michael Porter v. R. Bruce Tharpe and Christopher James Ronquillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.