Robert Thomas Crouchman v. Kevin James Wieczorek

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 28, 2005
Docket127871
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Thomas Crouchman v. Kevin James Wieczorek (Robert Thomas Crouchman v. Kevin James Wieczorek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Thomas Crouchman v. Kevin James Wieczorek, (Mich. 2005).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

127871 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly ROBERT THOMAS CROUCHMAN and Maura D. Corrigan SUGAR M. CROUCHMAN, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiffs, Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 127871

COA: 248419

Wayne CC: 01-112063-NI

MOTOR CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY and CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants,

and KEVIN JAMES WIECZOREK,

Defendant/Third-Party

Plaintiff/Appellee,

v AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

a/k/a HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Third-Party Defendant/Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On December 1, 2005, the Court heard oral arguments on third-party defendant’s application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and the summary disposition orders of the Wayne Circuit Court, and REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for entry of an order granting third-party defendant’s motion for summary disposition. The unambiguous language of §IV.1.a(1) of the insurance policy does not extend liability coverage to the vehicle the third-party plaintiff was operating. See Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co of Michigan v Nikkel, 460 Mich 558 (1999). Coverage cannot be based on the language in §IV.1.c(2) of the policy, because the language of that provision excludes coverage and does not create coverage. See Auto-Owners Ins Co v Harrington, 455 Mich 377, 381-2 (1997).

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., concur in the result only.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 28, 2005 _________________________________________ d1221 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Harrington
565 N.W.2d 839 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1997)
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Nikkel
596 N.W.2d 915 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Thomas Crouchman v. Kevin James Wieczorek, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-thomas-crouchman-v-kevin-james-wieczorek-mich-2005.