Robert Theodore Wade v. William L. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Robert Theodore Wade v. William L. Smith

59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23199, 1995 WL 376175

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 26, 1995

Docket95-6369

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 168 (Robert Theodore Wade v. William L. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Theodore Wade v. William L. Smith, 59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23199, 1995 WL 376175 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Theodore WADE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
William L. SMITH, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-6369.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 26, 1995.

Robert Theodore Wade, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wade v. Smith, No. CA-94-2666-L (D. Md. Feb. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Theodore WADE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
William L. SMITH, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-6369.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 26, 1995.

Robert Theodore Wade, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wade v. Smith, No. CA-94-2666-L (D. Md. Feb. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23199, 1995 WL 376175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-theodore-wade-v-william-l-smith-ca4-1995.