Robert Taylor v. The Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company
This text of 436 F.2d 416 (Robert Taylor v. The Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On this appeal from the entry of judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff pursuant to the jury’s verdict in plaintiff's personal injury action, plaintiff contends that the District Court erred in its instructions to the jury and in ruling as inadmissible admissions made by defendant’s counsel in his Pre-Trial Memorandum.
On review of the record, and consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral argument, we cannot subscribe to plaintiff’s contentions.
The Judgment will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Chief Judge Sheridan in his Opinion, 320 F.Supp. 1381 denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
436 F.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-taylor-v-the-allis-chalmers-manufacturing-company-ca3-1970.