Robert T. Mathis v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

351 F.2d 489
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 5, 1965·No. 22436_1·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the trial court denying the petition for habeas corpus from a state court conviction is affirmed.

Appellant’s complaint that the trial court failed to invoke the rule of sequestration of witnesses does not raise a question that can be reached by federal habeas corpus, since such denial does not amount to a deprivation of appellant’s constitutional rights, United States v. Brooks, 6 Cir., 303 F.2d 851.

The contention that appellant’s constitutional rights were denied him by the knowing use by the State of perjured testimony has not been presented to the state court for relief. It can therefore not be considered here. So, too, was there a failure by the appellant to present to the state court his contention that there had been an illegal exclusion of Negroes from the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert T. Mathis v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, 351 F.2d 489 (5th Cir. 1965).

351 F.2d 489 (Robert T. Mathis v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feodis Beal v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 2023
State v. Williams
960 A.2d 805 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2008)
United States v. Edwards
526 F.3d 747 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
State v. Beltran-Felix
922 P.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1996)
Rock v. Zimmerman
543 F. Supp. 179 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1982)
King v. Cook
287 F. Supp. 269 (N.D. Mississippi, 1968)
William Burton v. State of Alabama
396 F.2d 755 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Yates v. Breazeale
255 F. Supp. 820 (N.D. Mississippi, 1966)