Robert T. Burke v. United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation

559 F.2d 1182, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13056
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided June 7, 1977·No. 76-2046·Published·Cited by 31 cases

Opinion

While administrative proceedings were still pending before the Department of Justice, appellant Burke filed suit pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, seeking to compel release of copies of photographs which were introduced into evidence at his criminal trial. The Department of Justice ultimately determined while the instant proceedings were still pending that the photographs would be released upon payment of search and reproduction costs. Burke then requested that the district court order release of the documents without payment of these fees and that he be furnished $300.00 in attorney fees even though he was proceeding pro se. The district court, 432 F.Supp. 251, ordered that the government pay the costs of the suit but denied Burke’s requests that he be furnished attorney fees and that the government be ordered to furnish the photographs without payment of the fees.

After carefully reviewing the files and records in this case we are in full agreement with the analysis and conclusions of the district court as expressed in its orders filed September 13, 1976 and September 27, 1976. The judgment of the district court is accordingly affirmed.

The Clerk of this Court shall certify a copy of this order to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas as and for the mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert T. Burke v. United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation, 559 F.2d 1182, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13056 (10th Cir. 1977).

559 F.2d 1182 (Robert T. Burke v. United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cheavens v. Public Service Corp.
176 F. Supp. 3d 1088 (D. Colorado, 2016)
David P. Frankel v. District of Columbia Office for Planning and Economic Development
110 A.3d 553 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
Manos v. United States Department of the Air Force
829 F. Supp. 1191 (N.D. California, 1993)
Donahue v. Thomas
618 A.2d 601 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Ricki Gene Searcy v. Social Security Administration
956 F.2d 278 (Tenth Circuit, 1992)
Swanson & Setzke, Chtd. v. Henning
774 P.2d 909 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1989)
Conklin v. United States
654 F. Supp. 1104 (D. Colorado, 1987)
Falcone v. Internal Revenue Service
466 U.S. 908 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Michael Kuzma v. United States Postal Service
725 F.2d 16 (Second Circuit, 1984)
Clark v. United States
3 Cl. Ct. 194 (Court of Claims, 1983)
Dennis M. Wolfel v. United States
711 F.2d 66 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
In Re Emergency Beacon Corp.
27 B.R. 757 (S.D. New York, 1983)
Peniman v. Cartwright
550 F. Supp. 1302 (S.D. Iowa, 1982)
Blakey v. Department of Justice
549 F. Supp. 362 (District of Columbia, 1982)
Pitts v. Vaughn
679 F.2d 311 (Third Circuit, 1982)
Cunningham v. Federal Bureau Of Investigation
664 F.2d 383 (Third Circuit, 1981)