ROBERT T. BLINN, ESQ. v. WEST SHORE VILLAS OF NAPLES OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

244 So. 3d 396
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 25, 2018
Docket17-3601
StatusPublished

This text of 244 So. 3d 396 (ROBERT T. BLINN, ESQ. v. WEST SHORE VILLAS OF NAPLES OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ROBERT T. BLINN, ESQ. v. WEST SHORE VILLAS OF NAPLES OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., 244 So. 3d 396 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT BLINN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case Nos. 2D17-2565 ) 2D17-3601 WEST SHORE VILLAS OF NAPLES ) OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ) CONSOLIDATED ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed April 25, 2018.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Collier County; James R. Shenko, Judge.

Andrew B. Greenlee of Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, for Appellant.

Robert G. Menzies of FisherBroyles, LLP, Naples, for Appellee.

VILLANTI, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, Robert Blinn appeals the final judgment

entered in favor of West Shore Villas of Naples Owners Association, Inc. (the

Association), in Blinn's action against the Association for trespass, breach of the

declaration of covenants, and private nuisance and a second final judgment awarding

the Association its attorney's fees. We reject without comment Blinn's arguments relating to the substantive

final judgment concerning whether his claims were barred by the statute of limitations,

waiver, or laches. However, as to the attorney's fees judgment, Blinn is correct that the

trial court erred when it included in that judgment the Association's appellate attorney's

fees incurred in an earlier appeal in which this court specifically denied the Association's

motion for appellate fees. See, e.g., Bartow HMA, LLC v. Kirkland, 146 So. 3d 1213,

1215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ("A trial court cannot award appellate attorney's fees unless

the appellate court has authorized such an award." (quoting Rados v. Rados, 791 So.

2d 1130, 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001))). The Association has properly conceded error.

Hence, on this limited point, we reverse the final judgment awarding attorney's fees and

remand for the trial court to recalculate the fee award after deducting the improper

appellate attorney's fees. In all other respects, we affirm.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

MORRIS and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rados v. Rados
791 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Bartow HMA, LLC v. Kirkland
146 So. 3d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 So. 3d 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-t-blinn-esq-v-west-shore-villas-of-naples-owners-association-fladistctapp-2018.