Robert Stinson v. Raymond Rawson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robert Stinson v. Raymond Rawson. Read the opinion of the Court — 868 F.3d 516
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided August 26, 2015·No. 13-3346·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 26, 2015

Before

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

Nos. 13‐3343, 13‐3346 & 13‐3347

ROBERT STINSON, Appeals from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellee, Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. v. No. 09‐cv‐1033 JAMES GAUGER, LOWELL T. JOHNSON and RAYMOND C.N. Clevert, Jr., RAWSON, Judge. Defendants‐Appellants.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR, filed on August 25, 2015, by counsel for appellant,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. On page five in the second full paragraph, the second sentence of the paragraph is CORRECTED to read: “So Jackelen and Gauger flew to Las Vegas to meet with Dr. Raymond Rawson, a forensic odontologist on the staff of the Clark County Coroner’s Office in Nevada.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Stinson v. Raymond Rawson, (7th Cir. 2015).

Robert Stinson v. Raymond Rawson (Robert Stinson v. Raymond Rawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.