Robert Smythe v. Bailey, et al.
This text of Robert Smythe v. Bailey, et al. (Robert Smythe v. Bailey, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT SMYTHE, Case No. 1:25-cv-01624-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE SIGNED COMPLAINT 13 v. (ECF No. 5) 14 BAILEY, et al., THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Robert Smythe (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On November 25, 2025, the Court issued an order striking Plaintiff’s complaint as 20 unsigned and requiring Plaintiff to file a signed complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal 21 within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 5.) 22 On December 10, 2025, Plaintiff responded to the Court’s order by filing a copy of the 23 final page of his complaint, including his signature. (ECF No. 7.) 24 Plaintiff is advised that because his original complaint was stricken as unsigned, he is 25 required to file a complete and signed complaint in order to comply with the Court’s November 26 25, 2025 order. Merely filing the completed signature page of his complaint is not sufficient. 27 Plaintiff will therefore be granted a final opportunity to comply with the Court’s order to file a 28 complete and signed complaint in order to proceed with this action. 1 Plaintiff is reminded that his complaint should be brief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), but it must 2 state what each named defendant did that led to the deprivation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, 3 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009). Although accepted as true, the “[f]actual 4 allegations must be [sufficient] to raise a right to relief above the speculative level . . . .” Bell 5 Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citations omitted). 6 Finally, Plaintiff is advised that the signed complaint supersedes the original stricken 7 complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa Cty., 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012). Therefore, Plaintiff’s 8 signed complaint must be “complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded 9 pleading.” Local Rule 220. 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 11 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form; 12 2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a 13 complete and signed complaint (or file a notice of voluntary dismissal); and 14 3. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court will recommend dismissal of 15 this action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and for failure to state a 16 claim. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18
19 Dated: December 11, 2025 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Smythe v. Bailey, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-smythe-v-bailey-et-al-caed-2025.