Robert S Woods v. Warden

District Court, C.D. California·Decided June 6, 2023·No. 8:23-cv-00986·Unknown

Opinion

ROBERT S. WOODS, No. 2:23-CV-1002-DMC-P Petitioner, ORDER v. Respondent. Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition challenges a conviction and/or sentence issued by the Orange County Superior Court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241(d), courts in both the district of conviction and the district of confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973). Because any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of Petitioner's application are more readily available in Orange County, which is within the boundaries of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, this matter should be transferred to that court. See id. at 499 n.15. / / / / / / / / / ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Dated: June 5, 2023 Svc DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert S Woods v. Warden, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Robert S Woods v. Warden (Robert S Woods v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky
410 U.S. 484 (Supreme Court, 1973)