Robert S Woods v. Warden
This text of Robert S Woods v. Warden (Robert S Woods v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT S. WOODS, No. 2:23-CV-1002-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. 14 WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition challenges a conviction and/or sentence 19 issued by the Orange County Superior Court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241(d), courts in both the 20 district of conviction and the district of confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over 21 applications for habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 22 410 U.S. 484 (1973). Because any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of 23 Petitioner's application are more readily available in Orange County, which is within the 24 boundaries of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, this matter 25 should be transferred to that court. See id. at 499 n.15. 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the 2 || United States District Court for the Central District of California. 3 4 | Dated: June 5, 2023 Svc DENNIS M. COTA 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert S Woods v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-s-woods-v-warden-cacd-2023.