Robert S. Denham Co. v. Salt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robert S. Denham Co. v. Salt

162 A.D. 894, 146 N.Y.S. 1110

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D. 894 (Robert S. Denham Co. v. Salt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert S. Denham Co. v. Salt, 162 A.D. 894, 146 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order denying the motion to open the default should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to open the default and set aside the judgment granted on payment of the costs as taxed. The order denying the motion for a reargument of the motion to open the default is affirmed, without costs to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order denying motion to open default reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted on payment of costs to be taxed. Order denying motion for reargument affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order denying the motion to open the default should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to open the default and set aside the judgment granted on payment of the costs as taxed. The order denying the motion for a reargument of the motion to open the default is affirmed, without costs to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order denying motion to open default reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted on payment of costs to be taxed. Order denying motion for reargument affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D. 894, 146 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-s-denham-co-v-salt-nyappdiv-1914.