Robert Russell Williams v. State
This text of Robert Russell Williams v. State (Robert Russell Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 04-99-00815-CR
Robert Russell WILLIAMS,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1999CR3095
Honorable Mary Román, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 6, 2000
AFFIRMED
Robert Russell Williams (AWilliams@) pled guilty to the offense of unauthorized use of a vehicle and was sentenced in accordance with the terms of his plea bargain agreement. Williams= court-appointed attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Williams with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 1996, no pet.).
We have reviewed the record and counsel=s brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel=s motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.
PHIL HARDBERGER,
CHIEF JUSTICE
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Russell Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-russell-williams-v-state-texapp-2000.