Robert Rogers v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 31, 2020
Docket20A-CR-702
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Rogers v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Robert Rogers v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Rogers v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), (Ind. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 31 2020, 9:31 am

court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals and Tax Court estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Valerie K. Boots Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Christopher Taylor-Price Attorney General of Indiana Marion County Public Defender Agency Samuel J. Dayton – Appellate Division Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Robert Rogers, August 31, 2020 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No. 20A-CR-702 v. Appeal from the Marion Superior State of Indiana, Court The Honorable David Hooper, Appellee-Plaintiff. Magistrate Trial Court Cause No. 49G12-1810-CM-34608

Mathias, Judge.

[1] Following a jury trial in Marion Superior Court, Robert Rogers (“Rogers”) was

convicted of Class A misdemeanor battery resulting in bodily injury and was

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-CR-702 | August 31, 2020 Page 1 of 7 sentenced to 365 days, with all but two days suspended to probation. The trial

court’s sentencing order also required Rogers to pay an “Adult Probation

Administrative Fee” of $290. Rogers appeals and argues that the $290 fee

exceeds the statutory maximum of $50. The State claims that the $290 fee is

simply mislabeled. We agree and remand for correction of the trial court’s

order.

Facts and Procedural History [2] On October 8, 2018, Nicholas Dandurand (“Nicholas”) was driving his car in

Indianapolis when it was clipped by a Budget Rental box truck. The truck

pulled into a nearby Budget Rental lot and its driver1 got out of the truck.

Nicholas and his wife Sara (“Sara”), who had been following Nicholas in her

car, both pulled into the lot to inform the driver that he had hit Nicholas’s car.

The driver indicated that he did not have insurance, so Nicholas called the

police while Sara went into the rental office.

[3] Inside the rental office, Sara encountered Rogers, the branch manager. Rogers

curtly informed her that the office was closed. Sara told Rogers that a Budget

Rental truck had collided with her husband’s car. Rogers went outside and told

Nicholas to get off the property. But Nicholas remained on the phone with the

police, angering Rogers, who began to yell. Nicholas told Rogers that he was on

1 The State’s brief indicates that Rogers was the driver of the truck. The transcript does not support this assertion. Instead, the driver was an unknown male who left the scene in another car immediately before Nicholas’s confrontation with Rogers. See Tr. pp. 46, 60–61.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-CR-702 | August 31, 2020 Page 2 of 7 the phone and Rogers “came at” him. Tr. p. 45. Rogers shoved and pushed

Nicholas, including shoving him in the back when Nicholas turned away. And

when Nicholas tried to get back into his car, Rogers, with his fists balled up and

cursing, blocked his way. Concerned that the conflict would escalate further,

Nicholas told Sara to leave.2 Rogers chased after Nicholas. He briefly went back

inside the office but was back outside when the police arrived.

[4] Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Officer Jerome Harrison

(“Officer Harrison”) arrived on the scene, where he saw Rogers in Nicholas’s

face, yelling at him. Rogers was “very aggressive” and would not listen to

Officer Harrison. Tr. p. 69. In contrast, Nicholas and Sara were relaxed. Officer

Harrison spoke with the Dandurands while another officer spoke with Rogers.

As a result of Rogers’s assault, Nicholas had scratches on his back and

shoulders.

[5] On October 9, 2018, the State charged Rogers with Class A misdemeanor

battery resulting in bodily injury. A jury trial was held on January 30, 2020, at

the conclusion of which the jury found Rogers guilty as charged. The trial court

sentenced Rogers on February 26, 2020, and ordered him to serve one year,

with two days executed, and the remainder suspended to probation. The trial

2 Sara left the immediate area but returned when the police arrived.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-CR-702 | August 31, 2020 Page 3 of 7 court ordered Rogers to complete a twelve-week anger-management program.

In addition, the trial court imposed costs and fees as follows:

Court Costs and Fees Adult Probation Administrative Fee - CR $290.00 Adult Probation Monthly and Initial User Fees - CR $48.50 Automated Record Keeping Fee - CR $20.00 Court Administration Fee - CR $5.00 Court Costs - City and Town - CR $3.60 Court Costs - County - CR $32.40 Court Costs - State - CR $84.00 Criminal Court Fines $250.00 DNA Sample Processing Fee - CR $3.00 Document Storage Fee - CR $5.00 Indianapolis Metropolitan Police $4.00 Judicial Insurance Adjustment Fee - CR $1.00 Judicial Salary Fee - CR $20.00 Jury Fee - CR $2.00 Probation User Fee - Clerk’s 3% - CR $1.50 Public Defense Administration Fee - CR $5.00 Supplemental Public Defender Fee - CR $50.00 Total: $825.00

Appellant’s App. p. 17 (emphasis added). Rogers now appeals.

Discussion and Decision [6] Rogers argues that the trial court erred by imposing an “Adult Probation

Administrative Fee” of $290. Rogers claims that this fee is in excess of the

statutory maximum of $50. Rogers correctly notes that the probation fee statute

provides:

In addition to any other conditions of probation, the court may order each person convicted of a misdemeanor to pay:

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-CR-702 | August 31, 2020 Page 4 of 7 (1) not more than a fifty dollar ($50) initial probation user’s fee;

(2) a monthly probation user’s fee of not less than ten dollars ($10) nor more than twenty dollars ($20) for each month that the person remains on probation;

(3) the costs of the laboratory test or series of tests to detect and confirm the presence of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen or antibodies to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) if such tests are required by the court under section 2.3 of this chapter; and

(4) an administrative fee of fifty dollars ($50);

to either the probation department or the clerk.

Ind. Code § 35-38-2-1(e) (emphasis added). Thus, at first glance, it appears that

the trial court’s imposition of an administrative fee of $290 was improper

because it exceeds the statutory maximum of $50.

[7] The State argues that the trial court’s fee order is simply mislabeled, and that

the total fees imposed are within the maximum amounts authorized by statute.

Specifically, the State notes that, pursuant to the probation fee statute, the trial

court could require Rogers to pay three fees which together could not exceed

$340: $50 for the initial probation fee, $50 for the probation administrative fee,

and $240 for twelve monthly probation fees of $20 each. Here, the trial court

ordered Rogers to pay a total of $338.50 for these three fees, which does not

exceed the statutory maximum of $340.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-CR-702 | August 31, 2020 Page 5 of 7 [8] Looking at the trial court’s order, it is evident that the court mistakenly

switched the probation administrative fee with that of the initial and monthly

probation fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 35-38-2-1
Indiana § 35-38-2-1(e)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Rogers v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-rogers-v-state-of-indiana-mem-dec-indctapp-2020.