Robert Reeves v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Robert Reeves v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Robert Reeves v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 23, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 147997 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, ROBERT REEVES, Justices Plaintiff, v SC: 147997 AGC: 1628-13 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered and, in lieu of granting relief, we DIRECT the Attorney Grievance Commission to provide a supplemental answer to the complaint within 28 days after the date of this order, explaining in greater and more specific detail its reasons for concluding that AGC File No. 1628-13 should be closed. The supplemental answer will be considered part of the AGC file and held confidential pursuant to MCR 9.126.
The complaint for superintending control remains pending.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 23, 2014 s0416 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Reeves v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-reeves-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2014.