Robert Ray Lacina v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 16, 2022·No. 04-22-00021-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 16, 2022

No. 04-22-00021-CR

Robert Ray LACINA, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas Trial Court No. CR-XX-XXXXXXX Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER On February 14, 2022, appellant filed two pro se motions: (1) a motion requesting the appointment of counsel on appeal and (2) a motion requesting access to the record on appeal. In January 2022, the trial court appointed Mr. Patrick Maguire as appellant’s counsel on appeal. Therefore, appellant’s pro se motion requesting appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT. Because appellant is represented by counsel on appeal, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Therefore, we DENY his motion requesting access to the record on appeal.

_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of February, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Ray Lacina v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Robert Ray Lacina v. the State of Texas (Robert Ray Lacina v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.