Robert R. Gehler v. Paul E. M. Iasigi

Third Circuit

Robert R. Gehler v. Paul E. M. Iasigi

407 F.2d 448, 7 V.I. 3

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 6, 1969

Docket17384_1

StatusPublished

This text of 407 F.2d 448 (Robert R. Gehler v. Paul E. M. Iasigi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert R. Gehler v. Paul E. M. Iasigi, 407 F.2d 448, 7 V.I. 3 (3d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has argued pro se his appeal from a judgment in the amount of $1,143.24 and an attorney’s fee of $225.00 for services rendered to him by the plaintiff as a bookkeeper and tax analyst.

The District Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court in a comprehensive opinion which makes it clear that the case involved questions of fact which the Municipal Court resolved in favor of the plaintiff, a conclusion which it could not say was clearly erroneous. 6 V.I. 352.

We agree and therefore will affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI