Robert R. Frank v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue

351 F.2d 384, 16 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5737
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 8, 1965·No. 22211·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by a taxpayer-lawyer from an order by the district court, entered at the instance of the District Director of Internal Revenue requiring appellant to produce “all books, records and documents sought * * * excluding, however, copies of any privileged communications from the Respondent’s clients to the Respondent, or from the Respondent to his clients.” The order further provided that:

“No attorney-client privilege attaches to records showing the names of the Respondent’s clients, nor the books, records and documents showing property of said clients in the hands of the Respondent.”

We agree with the statement in Colton v. United States, 2 Cir., 306 F.2d 633, that “the identity of a client, or the fact that a given individual has become a client are matters which an attorney normally may not refuse to disclose, * * The order entered by the trial court here reserves to the court the opportunity to resolve any question that may arise by reason of the court’s authorizing appellant to withhold copies of any privileged communications between the lawyer and his client. With this saving provision included in the order, we find that the trial court did not err in requiring the production of the books, records and documents as requested.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert R. Frank v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue, 351 F.2d 384, 16 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5737 (5th Cir. 1965).

351 F.2d 384 (Robert R. Frank v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor Lohmeyer Law Firm PLLC v. United States
385 F. Supp. 3d 548 (W.D. Texas, 2019)
State v. Greiner
603 So. 2d 821 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena for Attorney
724 F. Supp. 458 (S.D. Texas, 1989)
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena, Peek
682 F. Supp. 1552 (M.D. Georgia, 1987)
United States v. Goodman, Dunberg & Hochman, P.A.
660 F. Supp. 929 (S.D. Florida, 1987)
Corry v. Meggs
498 So. 2d 508 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
United States v. Aronson
610 F. Supp. 217 (S.D. Florida, 1985)
Ringsmuth v. State
444 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
In Re GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION
723 F.2d 447 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
In Re Witness Before Grand Jury No. 82-5
558 F. Supp. 1089 (S.D. Florida, 1983)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United States
517 F.2d 666 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Jones
517 F.2d 666 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Dickinson
308 F. Supp. 900 (D. Arizona, 1969)