Robert Pirtle v. Bobby Hudson, Tom Cunningham, Herbert Faught, Phillip Raiford, Lee Tomlinson, Freeman, Captain

929 F.2d 701, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 12978, 1991 WL 46516
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 1991
Docket89-6391
StatusUnpublished

This text of 929 F.2d 701 (Robert Pirtle v. Bobby Hudson, Tom Cunningham, Herbert Faught, Phillip Raiford, Lee Tomlinson, Freeman, Captain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Pirtle v. Bobby Hudson, Tom Cunningham, Herbert Faught, Phillip Raiford, Lee Tomlinson, Freeman, Captain, 929 F.2d 701, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 12978, 1991 WL 46516 (6th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

929 F.2d 701

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Robert PIRTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bobby HUDSON, Tom Cunningham, Herbert Faught, Phillip
Raiford, Lee Tomlinson, Freeman, Captain,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6391.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 4, 1991.

D.Tenn., No. 89-01011.

W.D.Tenn.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before KENNEDY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and FEIKENS, Senior District Judge*.

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of an order filed in the district court on February 27, 1991, upon remand from this court. This court remanded the case to the district court on July 26, 1990, for that court to make factual findings as to whether the pro se appellant Pirtle prepared, signed and delivered the notice of appeal to prison authorities for mailing. The district court's February 27 findings of fact stated that Pirtle testified that a fellow inmate by the name of George T. Haynie, Jr., prepared, signed, and mailed the notice of appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed. This court lacks jurisdiction in that Haynie did not have authority to file a notice of appeal on behalf of Pirtle. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1654; Bonacci v. Kindt, 868 F.2d 1442, 1443 (5th Cir.1989).

*

The Honorable John Feikens, Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 F.2d 701, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 12978, 1991 WL 46516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-pirtle-v-bobby-hudson-tom-cunningham-herbert-faught-phillip-ca6-1991.