Robert Peters v. S.E. ARK Behavioral Healthcare

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2025·No. 25-1581·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 25-1581

Robert Peters

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Southeast Arkansas Behavioral Healthcare

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Delta

Submitted: October 3, 2025 Filed: October 8, 2025

[Unpublished]

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Peters appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se employment-related action against his former employer, Southeast

1 The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Arkansas Behavioral Healthcare System, Inc. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, see Schaffhauser v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 794 F.3d 899, 902 (8th Cir. 2015) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo); we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Peters v. S.E. ARK Behavioral Healthcare, (8th Cir. 2025).

Robert Peters v. S.E. ARK Behavioral Healthcare (Robert Peters v. S.E. ARK Behavioral Healthcare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chris Schaffhauser v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
794 F.3d 899 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)