Robert P. Gray, Leslie I. Rogers, Jennings H. Graham, Edward Y. Osborne, D/B/A Gray, Rogers, Graham and Osborne v. National Labor Relations Board
295 F.2d 38, 48 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3118
Opinion
The case involves two temporary employees in a very small operation. We are unable to find sufficient jurisdictional basis for enforcement of the proposed order or that enforcement would effectuate the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act. Cf. N. L. R. B. v. Trama, 9 Cir., 1961, 293 F.2d 28; and N. L. R. B. v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc., 9 Cir., 290 F.2d 210.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert P. Gray, Leslie I. Rogers, Jennings H. Graham, Edward Y. Osborne, D/B/A Gray, Rogers, Graham and Osborne v. National Labor Relations Board, 295 F.2d 38, 48 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3118 (9th Cir. 1961).
295 F.2d 38 (Robert P. Gray, Leslie I. Rogers, Jennings H. Graham, Edward Y. Osborne, D/B/A Gray, Rogers, Graham and Osborne v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Labor Relations Board v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.
290 F.2d 210 (Ninth Circuit, 1961)
National Labor Relations Board v. Mike Trama
293 F.2d 28 (Ninth Circuit, 1961)