Robert Orlick v. Grand Forks Housing Authority

616 F. App'x 218

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Orlick appeals after the district court 1 dismissed one of his pro se civil actions as barred by res judicata, and dismissed another of his pro se civil actions for failure to state a claim. He has filed an “emergency motion” on appeal. After careful de novo review, see Laase v. Cty. of Isanti, 638 F.3d 853, 856 (8th Cir.2011); Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir.2007), we conclude that Orlick’s complaints were properly dismissed for the reasons explained by the district court. Accord ingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The pending motion is denied.

1 . The Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North Dakota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).