Robert Oettinger v. Norton Company, Arrow Tool, Die & MacHine Company and General Scientific Equipment Company

Third Circuit

Robert Oettinger v. Norton Company, Arrow Tool, Die & MacHine Company and General Scientific Equipment Company

253 F.2d 712, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3923

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 1958

Docket12449

StatusPublished

This text of 253 F.2d 712 (Robert Oettinger v. Norton Company, Arrow Tool, Die & MacHine Company and General Scientific Equipment Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Oettinger v. Norton Company, Arrow Tool, Die & MacHine Company and General Scientific Equipment Company, 253 F.2d 712, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3923 (3d Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

253 F.2d 712

Robert OETTINGER, Appellant,
v.
NORTON COMPANY, Arrow Tool, Die & Machine Company and General Scientific Equipment Company.

No. 12449.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 1, 1958.

Decided April 10, 1958.

Appeal from the United States District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania; William H. Kirkpatrick, Judge.

Harvey Levin, Philadelphia, Pa., (Bernstein & Bernstein, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Philip Price, Philadelphia, Pa. (Arthur W. Leibold, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., Barnes, Dechert, Price, Myers & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges, and LAYTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed on the opinion of Chief Judge Kirkpatrick, D.C. E.D.Pa.1957, 160 F.Supp. 399.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI