Robert Oden v. Unites States of America

D.C. Circuit

Robert Oden v. Unites States of America

295 F.2d 546, 111 U.S. App. D.C. 201

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1961

Docket16381

StatusPublished

This text of 295 F.2d 546 (Robert Oden v. Unites States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Oden v. Unites States of America, 295 F.2d 546, 111 U.S. App. D.C. 201 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from conviction of the crime of assault with intent to commit robbery, 1 appellant urges, first, that there was not sufficient evidence to show the requisite intent. We think the record amply justifies the jury’s finding.

Further, appellant urges that the manner in which the jury returned its verdict was improper. It does not so appear, and, quite aside from that fact, no objection was made at the trial. 2 We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

1

. § 22-501 D.C.Code.

2

. Appellant was represented at the trial by counsel other than counsel representing him in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI