Robert Obey v. City of New York

73 N.E.3d 850, 29 N.Y.3d 958
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 4, 2017
Docket85 SSM 4
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 73 N.E.3d 850 (Robert Obey v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Obey v. City of New York, 73 N.E.3d 850, 29 N.Y.3d 958 (N.Y. 2017).

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that Court. Legally sufficient evidence supported the jury’s finding that defendant New York City Transit Authority was negligent and that its negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Wilson concur. Judge Garcia dissents and votes to affirm, in an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cabrera v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.
2020 NY Slip Op 3993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Obey v. City of New York
2017 NY Slip Op 3713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 N.E.3d 850, 29 N.Y.3d 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-obey-v-city-of-new-york-ny-2017.