Robert Noel Ray v. the State of Texas
This text of Robert Noel Ray v. the State of Texas (Robert Noel Ray v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-20-00092-CR
ROBERT NOEL RAY, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-00356-CRF-85
ABATEMENT ORDER
The development of this appeal has been substantially delayed by the Court’s
inability to view a video exhibit. Appellant offered, for the purposes of the appellate
record only, a video recording, Defense Record 1, in a proprietary format that is not
viewable by this Court using industry standard readily available software.
Notwithstanding requests by the Court to provide the Court with a viewable
exhibit, the Court has been unable to obtain this exhibit in a format viewable on the
Court’s computer system. The Office of Court Administration (OCA) is the intellectual technology service provider for the appellate courts. In that capacity, OCA controls the
software that can be loaded onto this Court’s computer system to use to view this, or any
other type, exhibit. If an exhibit cannot be viewed by use of the Court’s system, the Court
is not at liberty to download a program that may allow the Court to view the exhibit.
It is the joint responsibility of this Court and the trial court to ensure the timely
filing of the record on appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). Accordingly this appeal is ABATED
to the trial court to determine, within 21 days from the date of this ORDER, whether there
is a manner in which the video exhibit, Defense Record 1, can be made a part of the
appellate record, in a format that can be viewed by this Court for purposes of the appeal.
The viewable video ultimately provided to the Court must be certified by the court
reporter as the exhibit offered as part of the official record for this appeal.
If the trial court determines the exhibit cannot be made a part of the record as
required, the trial court shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law,
including whether the exhibit must be considered “lost or destroyed” for the purposes of
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6 due to the inability of this Court to view the
exhibit as part of the record of this appeal.
The trial court clerk is ORDERED to prepare and file a supplemental clerk's record
containing the written findings and orders of the trial court, if any, in this Court within
14 days from the date of the hearing, if any.
Further, the trial court's official reporter is ORDERED to prepare and file with the
Clerk of this Court a record of any hearing held regarding this abatement order within
Ray v. State Page 2 14 days from the date of the hearing, if any.
PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal abated Order issued and filed April 12, 2022 [RWR]
Ray v. State Page 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Noel Ray v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-noel-ray-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.