Robert N. Joos, Jr. v. Deputy Ratliff

Eighth Circuit

Robert N. Joos, Jr. v. Deputy Ratliff

97 F.3d 1125

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 11, 1996

Docket95-2103

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 F.3d 1125 (Robert N. Joos, Jr. v. Deputy Ratliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert N. Joos, Jr. v. Deputy Ratliff, 97 F.3d 1125 (8th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Robert Joos appeals from the district court’s¹ judgment in favor of defendants following an evidentiary hearing in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude the force employed against Joos in connection with his arrest was both de minimis and a reasonable response when Joos resisted officers’ attempts to effect his arrest and booking. We further conclude that the district court properly denied the remainder of Joos’s claims and that an extended discussion is unwarranted. Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Joos appeals from the district court’s¹ judgment in favor of defendants following an evidentiary hearing in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude the force employed against Joos in connection with his arrest was both de minimis and a reasonable response when Joos resisted officers’ attempts to effect his arrest and booking. We further conclude that the district court properly denied the remainder of Joos’s claims and that an extended discussion is unwarranted. Accordingly, we affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 F.3d 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-n-joos-jr-v-deputy-ratliff-ca8-1996.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack