Robert Murillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 31, 2012·No. 14-11-00966-CR·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted and Order filed May 31, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00966-CR

ROBERT MURILLO, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1269679

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court his desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 338th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before June 15, 2012; that the

clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Murillo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Robert Murillo v. State (Robert Murillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)