Robert Mitchell Carol Mitchell v. Taylor Rental Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Massachusetts Mutual Insurance Company

59 F.3d 175, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23547, 1995 WL 353755
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 12, 1995
Docket94-55361
StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 175 (Robert Mitchell Carol Mitchell v. Taylor Rental Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Massachusetts Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Mitchell Carol Mitchell v. Taylor Rental Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Massachusetts Mutual Insurance Company, 59 F.3d 175, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23547, 1995 WL 353755 (9th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

59 F.3d 175
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Robert MITCHELL; Carol Mitchell, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TAYLOR RENTAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation;
Massachusetts Mutual Insurance Company,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-55361.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 7, 1995.*
Decided June 12, 1995.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Robert Mitchell appeals the district court's grant of attorney's fees to Taylor. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

On February 25, 1994, the Mitchells filed a notice of appeal from the district court's January 31, 1994 order granting attorney's fees to Taylor in an unspecified amount. On March 14, 1994, the court determined the amount of fees to which Taylor was entitled and issued a final order awarding those fees to Taylor. Robert Mitchell, but not Carol Mitchell, now appeals both the court's award of attorney's fees and the amount awarded. The premature notice of appeal here was not valid because the amount of attorney's fees was not decided until long after the notice had been filed. In re Jack Raley Construction, Inc., 17 F.3d 291, 294 (9th Cir.1994); see Intel Corp. v. Terabyte Int'l., Inc., 6 F.3d 614, 617 (9th Cir.1993) (order awarding attorney's fees but not setting the amount is not a final, appealable order).

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F.3d 175, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23547, 1995 WL 353755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-mitchell-carol-mitchell-v-taylor-rental-cor-ca9-1995.