Robert Mckinnon, III v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 2017
Docket17-0426
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Mckinnon, III v. State of Florida (Robert Mckinnon, III v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Mckinnon, III v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

ROBERT MCKINNON, III, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D17-0426

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed March 3, 2017.

Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Robert McKinnon, III, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, C.J., WINOKUR and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Mckinnon, III v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-mckinnon-iii-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.