Robert Mayo v. Norfolk Police Department

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 29, 2019
Docket18-7355
StatusUnpublished

This text of Robert Mayo v. Norfolk Police Department (Robert Mayo v. Norfolk Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Mayo v. Norfolk Police Department, (4th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7355

ROBERT LEE MAYO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Police Official; RICHARD DAVIS, III, Attorney; KATHLEEN ORTIZ, Public Defender,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00620-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 29, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Mayo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action brought by Robert Lee Mayo, the district

court entered an order dismissing the action without prejudice but subsequently vacated

the order of dismissal. Mayo noted his appeal from the order of dismissal. Because the

order appealed has been vacated, this appeal is now moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507

F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting forth principles of appellate mootness); Mellen v.

Bunting, 327 F.3d 355, 363-64 (4th Cir. 2003) (“When a case has become moot after the

entry of the district court’s judgment, an appellate court no longer has jurisdiction to

entertain the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Incumaa v. Ozmint
507 F.3d 281 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)
Mellen v. Bunting
327 F.3d 355 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Mayo v. Norfolk Police Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-mayo-v-norfolk-police-department-ca4-2019.