Robert Maurice Bloom v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of California
This text of 72 F.3d 109 (Robert Maurice Bloom v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
In view of the California Attorney General’s recognition of the complexity of death penalty cases and of the fact that such cases require far more time to prepare than does the ordinary case, respondents’ request for an extension of time until February 16, 1996, in which to file its brief, is granted. Respon *110 dents’ request to increase the page limit for its brief to 90 pages is also granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 F.3d 109, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9633, 95 Daily Journal DAR 16817, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35738, 1995 WL 744773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-maurice-bloom-v-arthur-calderon-warden-and-the-attorney-general-ca9-1995.