Robert Martinez Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 9, 2009
Docket04-09-00473-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Martinez Jr. v. State (Robert Martinez Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Martinez Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00473-CR

Robert MARTINEZ, Jr., Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-4298W Honorable Catherine Torres Stahl, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 9, 2009

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence on April 13, 2009. Because appellant did not file a motion

for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed May 13, 2009. TEX . R. APP . P. 26.2(a)(1). A

motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on May 28, 2009. TEX . R. APP . P.

26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 30, 2009, and appellant did not file a motion for

extension of time. 04-09-00473-CR

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo

v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered

timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last

day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen

days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the

motion for extension of time. See id. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within fifteen days

of the last day allowed for filing, and no motion for extension of time was filed.

On August 11, 2009, appellant was ordered to show cause in writing why this appeal should

not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id.; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802

S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought

by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).

On August 17, 2009, appellant’s attorney filed written notice with this court that counsel has

reviewed the record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” Because the appeal was not

timely filed, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Martinez Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-martinez-jr-v-state-texapp-2009.