Robert M. Jordan v. Dan Weddle

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2000
Docket99-1901
StatusUnpublished

This text of Robert M. Jordan v. Dan Weddle (Robert M. Jordan v. Dan Weddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert M. Jordan v. Dan Weddle, (8th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 99-1901 ___________

Robert M. Jordan, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * v. * * Dodge County Sheriff's Department; * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District Defendant, * of Nebraska. * Dan Weddle, Individually and in his * [UNPUBLISHED] capacity as Sheriff of Dodge County, * Nebraska, * * Defendant-Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: January 13, 2000

Filed: January 21, 2000 ___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert M. Jordan was terminated from his job as a Dodge County, Nebraska deputy sheriff after an on-the-job injury left him with permanent physical limitations that rendered him unable to make forcible arrests and unable to lift and carry people in need or passively resisting demonstrators. Jordan sued Dodge County Sheriff Dan Weddle in his individual capacity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming Weddle violated Jordan's equal protection rights by terminating Jordan because of his disabilities. Weddle moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity and appeals the denial of that motion. We reverse.

Weddle is entitled to qualified immunity if he did not violate Jordan's constitutional right to equal protection. Jordan is not similarly situated to other officers because he has not shown that any other Dodge County officer has been permitted to continue working with physical limitations and permanent medical restrictions like Jordan's. Because Jordan is not similarly situated to other officers, no equal protection violation could have occurred and a reasonable officer in Weddle's place could not have known equal protection would be offended if Jordan were terminated. See Hansen v. Rimel, 104 F.3d 189, 190 (8th Cir. 1997). We thus reverse the district court's denial of Weddle's motion for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jerry L. Hansen v. Judy Rimel, R.N., John Dahm
104 F.3d 189 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert M. Jordan v. Dan Weddle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-m-jordan-v-dan-weddle-ca8-2000.