Robert M. Drysdale v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Sixth Circuit

Robert M. Drysdale v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

232 F.2d 633

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 1956

Docket12596_1

StatusPublished

This text of 232 F.2d 633 (Robert M. Drysdale v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert M. Drysdale v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 232 F.2d 633 (6th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that certain legal fees, payment of which was made to the taxpayer subsequent to July 1, 1947, the effective date of the Michigan Community Property Act, Comp.Laws 1948, § 557.201 et seq., under a contingent fee contract, was “property * * * owned by him” before the effective date of the Act within the meaning of the Act, in that the legal services had been rendered, final judgments obtained against the United States, and money appropriated for the payment thereof prior to July 1, 1947, and accordingly was taxpayer’s separate property instead of community property of the taxpayer and his wife; Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 7 Cir., 132 F.2d 829, 832; Devlin v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 82 F.2d 731, 732; See: McGowan v. Parish, 237 U.S. 285, 297-300, 35 S.Ct. 543, 59 L.Ed. 955;

And, being also of the opinion that taxpayer has not brought himself within the provisions of Section 107(a) Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 107(a), for the reasons stated in the Tax Court’s opinion; Van Hook v. United States, 7 Cir., 204 F.2d 25, 28, certiorari denied 346 U.S. 825, 74 S.Ct. 42, 98 L.Ed. 350; Sloane v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 188 F.2d 254, 261, 29 A.L.R.2d 580.

It is ordered that the judgment of the Tax Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that certain legal fees, payment of which was made to the taxpayer subsequent to July 1, 1947, the effective date of the Michigan Community Property Act, Comp.Laws 1948, § 557.201 et seq., under a contingent fee contract, was “property * * * owned by him” before the effective date of the Act within the meaning of the Act, in that the legal services had been rendered, final judgments obtained against the United States, and money appropriated for the payment thereof prior to July 1, 1947, and accordingly was taxpayer’s separate property instead of community property of the taxpayer and his wife; Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 7 Cir., 132 F.2d 829, 832; Devlin v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 82 F.2d 731, 732; See: McGowan v. Parish, 237 U.S. 285, 297-300, 35 S.Ct. 543, 59 L.Ed. 955;

And, being also of the opinion that taxpayer has not brought himself within the provisions of Section 107(a) Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 107(a), for the reasons stated in the Tax Court’s opinion; Van Hook v. United States, 7 Cir., 204 F.2d 25, 28, certiorari denied 346 U.S. 825, 74 S.Ct. 42, 98 L.Ed. 350; Sloane v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 188 F.2d 254, 261, 29 A.L.R.2d 580.

It is ordered that the judgment of the Tax Court be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 F.2d 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-m-drysdale-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca6-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack