Robert M. Boyce v. Merchants Fire Insurance Company

308 F.2d 806
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 25, 1962
Docket27615
StatusPublished

This text of 308 F.2d 806 (Robert M. Boyce v. Merchants Fire Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert M. Boyce v. Merchants Fire Insurance Company, 308 F.2d 806 (2d Cir. 1962).

Opinion

308 F.2d 806

Robert M. BOYCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERCHANTS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 65, Docket 27615.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 24, 1962.
Decided Oct. 25, 1962.

Robert E. Cohn, Hartford, Conn. (Shulansky & Cohn, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Bruce W. Manternach, Hartford, Conn. (Colin C. Tait and Robinson, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm for the reasons set forth in the careful and reasoned opinion of Judge Anderson reported at 204 F.Supp. 311 (D. of Conn.1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyce v. Merchants Fire Insurance Co.
204 F. Supp. 311 (D. Connecticut, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
308 F.2d 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-m-boyce-v-merchants-fire-insurance-company-ca2-1962.