Robert Louis Porter v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Robert Louis Porter v. United States

339 F.2d 258, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3706

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 3, 1964

Docket21546_1

StatusPublished

This text of 339 F.2d 258 (Robert Louis Porter v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Louis Porter v. United States, 339 F.2d 258, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3706 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order denying motion of the appellant made pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. This case has been before us previously. Por *259 ter v. United States (5 Cir.1959), 272 F. 2d 695; (5 Cir.1962) 298 F.2d 461.

The trial court conducted a full, complete and extended hearing at which the appellant was present and was represented by competent counsel. The court examined the transcript of the proceedings, heard the testimony of the attorney who represented the appellant when he was tried and convicted, the testimony of an assistant United States attorney, a United States District Judge, and other witnesses. Following the hearing, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law.

In our opinion, the appellant has not been denied any of his rights, but on the other hand, his case has received full, complete, careful and cautious attention. This litigation should come to an end. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order denying motion of the appellant made pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. This case has been before us previously. Por *259 ter v. United States (5 Cir.1959), 272 F. 2d 695; (5 Cir.1962) 298 F.2d 461.

The trial court conducted a full, complete and extended hearing at which the appellant was present and was represented by competent counsel. The court examined the transcript of the proceedings, heard the testimony of the attorney who represented the appellant when he was tried and convicted, the testimony of an assistant United States attorney, a United States District Judge, and other witnesses. Following the hearing, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law.

In our opinion, the appellant has not been denied any of his rights, but on the other hand, his case has received full, complete, careful and cautious attention. This litigation should come to an end. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

339 F.2d 258, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-louis-porter-v-united-states-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack