Robert Long v. Michael Astrue

416 F. App'x 633
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2011
Docket09-35036
StatusUnpublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 416 F. App'x 633 (Robert Long v. Michael Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Long v. Michael Astrue, 416 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Robert Allen Long appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing for failure to prosecute his action seeking Social Security benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Townsel v. Cnty. of Contra Costa, Cal., 820 F.2d 319, 320 (9th Cir.1987). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action without prejudice because Long failed to serve the summons and complaint as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), or to show good cause for his failure. See id.

Long’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Long’s pending Motion for Emergency Court Protection is denied.

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 F. App'x 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-long-v-michael-astrue-ca9-2011.