Robert Lewis Banzer v. United States

367 F.2d 865
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 1967
Docket21088_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 367 F.2d 865 (Robert Lewis Banzer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Lewis Banzer v. United States, 367 F.2d 865 (9th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the judgment' imposed following appellant’s conviction by jury verdict of the six offenses charged in the indictment, all violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2314.

Inasmuch as no error affecting the substantial rights of appellant appears in connection with his conviction on the second count of the indictment [Fed.R. Crim.P. 52(a)], and the sentences on all counts were imposed to commence and run concurrently, we need not reach the point of decision as to the remaining five counts. [See: United States v. Romano, 382 U.S. 136, 138, 86 S.Ct. 279, 15 L.Ed. 2d 210 (1965) ; United States v. Gainey, 380 U.S. 63, 65, 85 S.Ct. 754, 13 L.Ed.2d 658 (1965); Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339, 359, 78 S.Ct. 311, 2 L.Ed.2d 321 (1958); Emspak v. United States, 349 U.S. 190, 195, 75 S.Ct. 687, 99 L.Ed. 997 (1955); Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, 85, 63 S.Ct. 1375, 87 L.Ed. 1774 (1943); Sinclair v. United States, 279 U.S. 263, 49 S.Ct. 268, 73 L.Ed. 692 (1929).]

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris Wilbur Lee v. United States
400 F.2d 185 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 F.2d 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-lewis-banzer-v-united-states-ca9-1967.