Robert Lewis Albright v. Warden of Mecklenburg

Fourth Circuit

Robert Lewis Albright v. Warden of Mecklenburg

37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34787, 1994 WL 556998

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1994

Docket93-6911

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1492 (Robert Lewis Albright v. Warden of Mecklenburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Lewis Albright v. Warden of Mecklenburg, 37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34787, 1994 WL 556998 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1492
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lewis ALBRIGHT, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OF MECKLENBURG, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6911.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 6, 1994.
Decided: Oct. 12, 1994.

Robert Lewis Albright, appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Albright v. Warden of Mecklenburg, No. CA-92-5-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1492
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lewis ALBRIGHT, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OF MECKLENBURG, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6911.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 6, 1994.
Decided: Oct. 12, 1994.

Robert Lewis Albright, appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Albright v. Warden of Mecklenburg, No. CA-92-5-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34787, 1994 WL 556998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-lewis-albright-v-warden-of-mecklenburg-ca4-1994.