Robert Lefebvre v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director, et al
This text of Robert Lefebvre v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director, et al (Robert Lefebvre v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director, et al) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Robert Lefebvre Case No. 25-cv-258-LM-TSM Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director, et al
ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated October 1, 2025. For the reasons explained therein, the Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is granted. The Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 5) is denied as moot. Mr. Lefebvre’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 4} is granted nunc pro tunc. “[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988}); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). The Clerk shall enter judgment and close this case.
Chief Jug#e Date: October 20, 2025
cc: Robert Lefebvre, pro se Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Lefebvre v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director, et al, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-lefebvre-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-director-et-al-nhd-2025.