Robert Lee Smith, Jr. v. Danny Safrit Sergeant Griggs B. Smith, Sergeant Charles Stevenson

Fourth Circuit

Robert Lee Smith, Jr. v. Danny Safrit Sergeant Griggs B. Smith, Sergeant Charles Stevenson

74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39046, 1996 WL 15426

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 17, 1996

Docket95-7363

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1233 (Robert Lee Smith, Jr. v. Danny Safrit Sergeant Griggs B. Smith, Sergeant Charles Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Lee Smith, Jr. v. Danny Safrit Sergeant Griggs B. Smith, Sergeant Charles Stevenson, 74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39046, 1996 WL 15426 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lee SMITH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Danny SAFRIT; Sergeant Griggs; B. Smith, Sergeant;
Charles Stevenson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7363.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 17, 1996.

Robert Lee Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Smith v. Safrit, No. CA-94-305-2 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lee SMITH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Danny SAFRIT; Sergeant Griggs; B. Smith, Sergeant;
Charles Stevenson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7363.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 17, 1996.

Robert Lee Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Smith v. Safrit, No. CA-94-305-2 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39046, 1996 WL 15426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-lee-smith-jr-v-danny-safrit-sergeant-griggs-ca4-1996.