Robert Lee Mullins v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 2, 2013
• Docket: 05-13-00511-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 2, 2013.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00511-CR No. 05-13-00512-CR

ROBERT LEE MULLINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-54412-R, F11-71584-R

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang-Miers Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Robert Lee Mullins was convicted of two failure to register as a sex offender offenses.

Pursuant to a plea agreements, the trial court sentenced appellant to four years’ imprisonment in

each case. In cause no. 05-13-00511-CR, the trial court also assessed a $2,000 fine. Appellant

waived his right to appeal in conjunction with the plea agreements. See Blanco v. State, 18

S.W.3d 218, 219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of

jurisdiction.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS Do Not Publish JUSTICE TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130511F.U05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

ROBERT LEE MULLINS, Appellant On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-13-00511-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F10-54412-R. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Moseley and Bridges participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 2nd day of August, 2013.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

ROBERT LEE MULLINS, Appellant On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-13-00512-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F11-71584-R. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Moseley and Bridges participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

–3–