Robert Lee Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 22, 2016·No. 03-16-00575-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD DISTRICT ,/receivedN

ROBERT LE IN DEC 2 2 2016

Appel Icikt \ THIRD COURT OF APPEALS ^FFREYIIKYLE /

VS. 03-16-00575-CR December 22, 2016

THE STATE OF EXAS Appellee,

Appeal kom The 331* DisWT Courf 11 TfWiS CouNfu, leXoS Couse Number 0- HX- %~^5&a

App^\ laoVs RespowseTb The SlATE's Aooel lee Bp'eF WOS WW Wl $ uaM)a!

on Arid +orcej >£r «• flcpe fljj- forar&jed to *5 reft: ft iMjiCto. a 4(0 < , 4tf <1 pe w ft or it /joihe Ja/^t 0 A' * :> 0JvT"O r/i

flxri "ihaf Ae we Drfort^|e#P,^^'' Jr am 0mm mm

a- W3— CD H=r54-j^^2^o ^ <3 O tt a^

of Aflpefli tftf. cotojO weixjflJXK fi (ih Of (MO Wi'W OfiPgfl ob ei ^bfc J —^ Fb] ftrfccliOA} o^qope &

LCJ.Forr/l 0X)(lAlfffGiewCl| of lVofo*: LU FT wr IhUriOP toi e /' i #W5 "to PfifXi'S J&1f& to >r IPC

D .r.iCAlOA) Of «£MW /r., 10

AWA/jr (Iiwofdff&il ujjc (Mwift^t itf 3. ^fi# fo Rfe ^ pf6-^ pdibtf -Par A^ '*

,recoft

fttvftW i 0-

W'CA Of OMOT0

of VtkeJo aHijQQ a ^oiwjm^ D€0

fo°y .0^ Q fi v-a# t &bMpJU)6l '3 IheTifl &f of Fo^ W Wtao^ of /m a

fid 'U1 o. ^4 ifote n ^ vAJ £ Pi ^ mo ( -fiaj Uiuf'-u i^AJWjCBci M] issue, q u«rtiour o or ote

a ££tti 04 gS3 W€5: fia s "o flppea \J

ft TTM ^)Ur '111 a

Lfo f4fir[|soi i-iGtfTox) Of-cpe- ajmiK fidrro 5 iorjef ^ Ajp life j?54.(a){qV

6. 1 . Ajar R^ if nGerT^LolTo IS9K. Ox) flffiMJ^O

"^cSj Ofifowr-\n--3aVp l^mhhym

ActfM 1x£Aim to

L&potp «,'& iBPiei

e ac- J

7 SatoTO le* It oppBllfljilr Nb|jC6 oP Apa^a\ ^os ™ hAjj\m Ok) ^.Jf^jfa aW m ^mi 30 imIkfoil ffl^

Trial Mft0&f1tft&(j Off&HdiriqM s

AcalrfhN icft of/fi/pi/ ojo Au fins?'? ?-a?/£ Th^-fb^,

^' i 4-- I

Tq IlOWl-^ <^> ^O %- a?

WO Ftu a) t^i € H I qcou/ojc rap reAter -Wrt" 9iroM-4fe,ff(^rd ijj or; 0 hWiiOQ o L eve v& rid (T^^ii \/a4t^>. m&tiw wt-m >+DK/dand °F ReVleW Arhok 40.ooi lexos Go* U1RProc

Ajoew-Fnal SFiq /I

6 WIO it- fii IKe ai^wJu ckcovum » 'M 9 ^(

JL y\t 0

ei$W. ^ M/ofi/& to his fl^f of .

rmoctfv&i foi tew a., (pw^omm % 5T» = ^ T-9 1?.^^ CO 53 i CO i i ] co I » "5? ^7- ^0 _sr-o 3 <^> k ^ ^ co cf^^fc. 1—J ~ms vmM mm ^pp^llofe, ^ecy5jojo For obv& flr^reb'ojo r^f^,

-ixjdwji of Fot 0W (MusjdJisoflQvJ. &gHftllod,WAS pipsecufcd Joo ^ , mo m a ~Rws Crime lohara .TVi? Portia \o\ ^ uw ijNJ q me, uiv/t ^/(/^ foj* or mr^Sekok rt /rim jo , Cost Q*&im> Hk^Omhi umg w -a j a/ M/aj6t aticrfWciJMJts 12- z buf-kr dm o Ojo^

0 used aiara-q oe pnofro 1(£J- ™ IA) (J fO iMlt/rprer-a'Tow a j 9

kr^n^fs h w^W, h\ %rfok QA 0M%'fft&ti 6

imfjuifl >robJe [f 'ts^r ^ (t 6fM how prolog" jO#W DJBT&U " v/io # uoy few' M /jvcJm/ /

o

M io odm^M Iaj mi /^l ., ,.e lexds, ForwsJc ob/eyvc£ nwtissxw foO Af/1ficf ao-^/<. Wc

fnAV £XpOT> fe/w (swim, lushfi Mehmrs —Q *-5l ^3 ,^fe 1 ^ ^ ^wfS TZ <"s «-v p-k cp^=^ iP-f— .-5 S5^--Gr-^> ^O v> O — ^ ^zr *o :#• *~- v — £••• ? ° sited ouMty of --he, Mow-lorn . rofdioru u w +ef-Ms ^--fio ^fponroo Accel Iftxjjj /Y)aho^ boo QWA Ddto SefltfJi £P> muted i^ec

ld.ri^-O^/0 BjOJAte am 6i .QW/ticrodf o pa ml

ucTto^fitoqifhon aro of ,ws, or tfi|o^rr^oo oH\tj3hijfSe 0 0£¥ to, b\$ta M £>iJd Ue cisd5t ^.OPIlSmAlfl hjS I.AJ^oTO bM ;iOO§ bb

Of the Cr0m DfocASs* o Z5" W, ( \ 1)0

o ftpto A jw or d&rfliA) ^'VA p(bhh

OK/duSiOKl rpel i^kfoj^ •'6oi&tf'rfe wm\Qi& iuhUj/fcz m

!fo0 o^iv)^ DtvA ^Jdfce* o p flit wfl£ * e-b \ir

WOO fc)A'v;G^ /M'b^' /£>• a^^saat! k 0)1t& CR(fo gYTOj>S flW towOT 'O-tie h)Q .Wf-OT w^.v^oo ( bV^btf- g-aw. OS, UV A IJ jojj "O a^roo ifo ivwfr-s of^pe-l ^] o t;

'ecjjM

A%

Exeotifej a/o0ec€^ko^~3o/o rwurnj/.

/7- ERTIFIG4TE OF SERVICE

,hm few

r

0.)V O

/ WcerfLeOiflrfAJ

//^^nrlo 7i 71/of qwfr ^RECEIVED ^, DEC 2 2 2016 THIRD COURIOF APPEALS.

?^30

r derfc '• ^

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Lee Martin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Robert Lee Martin v. State (Robert Lee Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.